This site uses tracking information. Visit our privacy policy. Click to agree to this policy and not see this again.

Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences

Punctate Inner Choroidopathy with Choroidal Neovascular Membrane

Punctate Inner Choroidopathy with Choroidal Neovascular Membrane

Pooja Patel, BS; Mahsaw Mansoor, MD; Ian Han, MD
January 9, 2023

INITIAL PRESENTATION

Chief Complaint: Decreased vision in the left eye

History of Present Illness: A 37-year-old woman presented urgently for evaluation of acute painless vision loss in her left eye. She noticed changes in her vision about one week prior to presentation, describing it as central blurring and distortion when trying to read small print. She denied any similar symptoms previously. She also denied any similar symptoms in her fellow (right) eye.

Past Ocular History: High myopia, both eyes

  • Representative refraction of -8.00 Sphere right eye (OD) and -7.25 Sphere left eye (OS)

Medical History: Asthma

Medications: Daily multivitamin

Family History: Non-contributory

Social History: No history of tobacco or illicit drug use

Review of Systems: Negative except for what is detailed in the history of present illness


OCULAR EXAMINATION

  • Corrected visual Acuity:
    • OD: 20/20
    • OS: 20/63, no improvement with pinhole
  • Ocular Motility/Alignment:
    • OD: Full extraocular motility
    • OS: Full extraocular motility
  • Intraocular Pressure:
    • OD: 14 mm Hg by Tonopen
    • OS: 13 mm Hg by Tonopen
  • Pupils:
    • No relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD)
  • Confrontation visual fields:
    • OD: Full
    • OS: Full
  • External:

    Both eyes (OU): Normal

  • Slit lamp examination:
    • Lids/lashes: Normal OU
    • Conjunctiva/sclera: Clear and quiet OU
    • Cornea: Clear OU
    • Anterior Chamber: Deep and quiet OU
    • Iris: Normal architecture OU
    • Lens: Clear OU
  • Dilated fundus examination (DFE):

    OD

    OS

    Vitreous

    Vitreous syneresis, no cell

    Vitreous syneresis, no cell

    Disc

    Peripapillary pigmentation

    Peripapillary pigmentation

    Cup-to-disc (C/D) ratio:

    0.2

    0.2

    Macula

    Few juxtafoveal hypopigmented spots

    Fovea-involving fibrovascular retinal pigment epithelial detachment with associated subretinal hemorrhage

    Vessels

    Normal

    Normal

    Periphery

    Few punched out chorioretinal spots with pigmentary change

    Few punched out chorioretinal spots with pigmentary change

  • Clarus color fundus photography, OU
    Figure 1: Clarus color fundus photography: In the right eye, there were several discrete (<500 micron) yellow-gray hypopigmented spots (arrowheads) parafoveally. The left eye had similar hypopigmented spots with a central greenish-gray pigment epithelial detachment and adjacent intra- and sub-retinal hemorrhage, including a Henle fiber layer hemorrhage (arrowhead).
    Spectralis optical coherence tomography, OU
    Figure 2: Spectralis optical coherence tomography: In the right eye (A), there were a few mild retinal pigment epithelium irregularities (representative lesion indicated by orange arrowhead) and focal choroidal excavations corresponding to the yellow lesions seen clinically, with no overlying fluid. In the left eye (B), there was a subfoveal focal choroidal excavation with overlying hyperreflective material and subretinal fluid (orange arrowheads).
    Cirrus Angioplex optical coherence tomography angiography, OS
    Figure 3: Cirrus Angioplex optical coherence tomography angiography, left eye: The en face choriocapillaris slab showed a distinct vascular net (arrowhead, top panel) corresponding to the pigment epithelial detachment seen on exam. Cross-sectional structural scan of this area also demonstrates vascular flow (arrowhead, bottom panel).
    Clarus fundus fluorescein angiography, OS
    Figure 4: Clarus fundus fluorescein angiography: In the left eye, there was early hyperfluorescence and blockage from the subretinal hemorrhage (A, arrowhead) with late leakage (B, arrowhead) from the subfoveal lesion corresponding to the fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment. In the right eye, there were multiple punctate areas of staining seen in the mid-to-late (C) and late frames (D) highlighting lesions that stain without leakage seen in choroidal neovascular membranes. Note that the number of lesions seen on FA is more numerous than apparent on the fundus photographs (Figure 1).

    Differential diagnosis:


    DIAGNOSIS: Punctate inner choroidopathy with choroidal neovascular membrane


    CLINICAL COURSE

    A diagnosis of punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC) was made based on the multiple hypopigmented spots in both eyes without evidence of intraocular inflammation elsewhere. The choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM) in the patient’s left eye has been successfully treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy on a treat-and-extend regimen. During six years of follow-up to date, she has had several recurrences of PIC activity, and these episodes of inflammation have been treated successfully with intravitreal triamcinolone and oral prednisone. At her most recent visit, her visual acuity remained excellent at 20/20 OD and 20/30 OS.


    DISCUSSION

    Etiology/Epidemiology

    Punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC) was first described by Watzke and colleagues in 1984 as an idiopathic inflammatory multifocal choroidopathy.[1] PIC predominantly affects otherwise healthy young women, usually between the second and fifth decades of life, with about 90% of reported cases between 18 to 40 years old. [2] Most patients are moderately myopic, and the degree of myopia is higher in PIC than in other white dot syndromes (e.g., diopter range of -3.25 to -10.0, with a mean diopter value of -4.6). [1,3]

    Pathophysiology

    The cause of PIC is largely unknown but thought to be inflammatory in nature.[4] Similar to other white dot syndromes, it is theorized that PIC is an autoimmune disease that arises in the context of an environmental stimulus. There is no known genetic component, as to date, no specific haplotype has been associated with PIC (unlike other white dot syndromes such as birdshot chorioretinitis).

    PIC is considered among the “white dot syndromes,” a constellation of conditions whose clinical features include white fundus lesions in the choroid, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and retina. [4,5] These inflammatory lesions are thought to be due to antigen response from an unidentified culprit (e.g., Epstein-Barr virus) [6] and are similar in clinical appearance to presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (POHS).[3] Histopathologic studies of PIC lesions have shown lymphocytic infiltration, supporting an inflammatory etiology. [7] PIC is sometimes considered within the spectrum of multifocal choroiditis (MFC), but patients with MFC are more prone to anterior chamber inflammation and/or vitritis. Furthermore, MFC typically has a more aggressive, chronic, and progressive course with worse visual prognosis compared to PIC.[4]

    As illustrated in this case, the chorioretinal lesions in PIC are small, often about 100-200 microns in diameter, and are frequently seen in the posterior pole of both eyes.[4] As lesions progress over time, they often have increased depigmentation and atrophic scarring of the RPE.[1] This depigmentation and atrophic scarring can lead to the development of choroidal neovascular membranes (CNVMs), which occurs in up to 75% of patients with PIC.[4]

    Signs/Symptoms

    The most common presenting symptom for patients with PIC is a central or paracentral scotoma.[3] Other symptoms of macular disease, including blurred central vision or metamorphopsia are common, and symptoms of intraocular inflammation including floaters, photophobia, photopsias, or loss of peripheral vision are possible.[3] Visual prognosis with PIC is generally good, but permanent vision loss can occur with CNVMs and subretinal fibrosis.[3] In the original cohort of patients described by Watzke et al., the presenting visual acuity was 20/50 or better in most patients.[1] Patients often present with unilateral symptoms but on clinical examination demonstrate a bilateral disease process.

    On clinical examination, the classic signs of PIC are small, white to yellow-gray lesions in the posterior pole that measure 100-200 microns in diameter.[4] These active lesions eventually develop into atrophic chorioretinal scars that may become increasingly pigmented with a “punched out” appearance. About a third of patients may develop CNVM and subsequent subretinal fibrosis, which is associated with a worse visual prognosis.[8]

    Testing/Laboratory work-up

    Multimodal ancillary testing and imaging have an important role in the diagnosis and evaluation of PIC. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is especially helpful to evaluate retinal and choroidal structural changes in PIC.[3,9] Clinically-active lesions are seen as disruptions of the RPE, with variable elevation and sub-RPE hyperreflectivity. Inner choroidal loss is a feature of PIC that may result in a focal choroidal excavation that is readily-visualized on OCT.[10,11] The disruption of Bruch’s membrane may predispose individuals to the development of a CNVM.

    Fluorescein angiography (FA) reveals punctate hyperfluorescent lesions in early and late phases with variable leakage in late phases. As in this case, the lesions seen on FA can be more numerous than those appreciated on clinical examination. The presence of CNVM is demonstrated by a characteristic area of hypofluorescence surrounded by early hyperfluorescence.[1] Specifically, PIC-associated CNVMs were found to have a lace-like appearance of neovascularization on FA.[4]

    A non-invasive modality that can also evaluate for choroidal vascular networks is OCT angiography (OCTA), which has been shown to have high sensitivity for detection of CNVMs when compared to FA.[12] In OCTA, an en face view of the outer-retina choriocapillaris slab can identify a vascular net with corresponding cross-sectional flow. OCTA is also clinically useful in assessing treatment response to anti-VEGF and can readily demonstrate involution of a CNVM.

    Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) is used less in clinical practice but can also be helpful in distinguishing PIC lesions. ICGA demonstrates hypofluorescence in the early and late stages along with midphases, consistent with decreased choroidal blood flow.[3]

    Treatment/Guidelines

    Treatment of PIC depends on the severity and clinical manifestations of disease activity. Observation is a reasonable approach for non-visually significant or fovea-sparing lesions. When there is vision threatening inflammation, treatment ranges from local therapy with intravitreal steroids to systemic steroid-sparing immunomodulatory therapy. The visual prognosis of PIC depends on the severity of disease and whether the clinical course is complicated by CNVM. Most patients, however, have a favorable prognosis with a final visual acuity of 20/40 or better.[4] While the overall prognosis is favorable, the activity and severity of the disease dictates the need for treatment. Acute chorioretinal lesions without CNVM may be treated initially with systemic corticosteroids, usually starting at 60-80 mg orally for 3-5 days followed by a taper that is dictated by the level of intraocular inflammation.[3] Local ocular steroid via peribulbar or intravitreal injection may also be effective.[3] In cases of progressive disease or recurrent activity, steroid-sparing treatment (e.g., mycophenolate mofetil) may be considered.[13]

    CNVM is common in PIC and is most effectively treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) and laser photocoagulation have also been reported to successfully treat CNVM in PIC, including in combination with anti-VEGF or intravitreal steroid therapy.[3,14]

    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND ETIOLOGY

    • Young age
    • Myopic, median age ~30 [4]
    • More common in women
    • Estimated 0.4 new cases per million population per year [8]

    SIGNS

    • Small, yellow-white lesions concentrated in the bilateral posterior poles
    • No vitritis or anterior chamber inflammation
    • Subretinal fluid, hemorrhage, or lipid suggests presence of CNVM
    • Atrophic chorioretinal scarring and subretinal fibrosis

    SYMPTOMS

    • Central or paracentral scotomas
    • Metamorphopisa
    • Floaters
    • Photopsia
    • Photophobia

    TREATMENT/MANAGEMENT

    • Observation
    • Intravitreal or periocular steroid injections, oral corticosteroids, or steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents
    • Intravitreal anti-VEGF/steroids or photodynamic therapy for CNVMs

    References

    • 1. Watzke RC, Packer AJ, Folk JC, Benson WE, Burgess D, Ober RR. Punctate inner choroidopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1984;98:572-84.
    • 2. Patel KH, Birnbaum AD, Tessler HH, Goldstein DA. Presentation and outcome of patients with punctate inner choroidopathy at a tertiary referral center. Retina 2011;31:1387-91.
    • 3. Campos J, Campos A, Mendes S, Neves A, Beselga D, Sousa JC. Punctate inner choroidopathy: a systematic review. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol 2014;3:76-82.
    • 4. Ahnood D, Madhusudhan S, Tsaloumas MD, Waheed NK, Keane PA, Denniston AK. Punctate inner choroidopathy: A review. Surv Ophthalmol 2017;62:113-126.
    • 5. Gilbert RM, Niederer RL, Kramer M, et al. Differentiating Multifocal Choroiditis and Punctate Inner Choroidopathy: A Cluster Analysis Approach. Am J Ophthalmol 2020;213:244-251.
    • 6. Tiedeman JS. Epstein-Barr viral antibodies in multifocal choroiditis and panuveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;103:659-63.
    • 7. Pachydaki SI, Jakobiec FA, Bhat P, et al. Surgical management and ultrastructural study of choroidal neovascularization in punctate inner choroidopathy after bevacizumab. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 2012;2:29-37.
    • 8. Brown J, Jr., Folk JC, Reddy CV, Kimura AE. Visual prognosis of multifocal choroiditis, punctate inner choroidopathy, and the diffuse subretinal fibrosis syndrome. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1100-5.
    • 9. Channa R, Ibrahim M, Sepah Y, et al. Characterization of macular lesions in punctate inner choroidopathy with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 2012;2:113-20.
    • 10. Gan Y, Ji Y, Zuo C, et al. Correlation between focal choroidal excavation and underlying retinochoroidal disease: A Pathological Hypothesis From Clinical Observation. Retina 2022;42:348-356.
    • 11. Kim H, Woo SJ, Kim YK, Lee SC, Lee CS. Focal Choroidal Excavation in Multifocal Choroiditis and Punctate Inner Choroidopathy. Ophthalmology 2015;122:1534-5.
    • 12. Gan Y, Zhang X, Su Y, Shen M, Peng Y, Wen F. OCTA versus dye angiography for the diagnosis and evaluation of neovascularisation in punctate inner choroidopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2022;106:547-552.
    • 13. Turkcuoglu P, Chang PY, Rentiya ZS, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil and fundus autofluorescence in the management of recurrent punctate inner choroidopathy. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2011;19:286-92.
    • 14. Chan WM, Lai TY, Lau TT, Lee VY, Liu DT, Lam DS. Combined photodynamic therapy and intravitreal triamcinolone for choroidal neovascularization secondary to punctate inner choroidopathy or of idiopathic origin: one-year results of a prospective series. Retina 2008;28:71-80.

Suggested citation format:

Patel P, Mansoor M, Han I. Punctate Inner Choroidopathy with Choroidal Neovascular Membrane. EyeRounds.org. January 9, 2023. Available from https://eyerounds.org/cases/336-PIC-with-CNVM.htm


Image Permissions:
Creative Commons

Ophthalmic Atlas Images by EyeRounds.org, The University of Iowa are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.