This site uses tracking information. Visit our privacy policy. Click to agree to this policy and not see this again.

Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences

Corneal Imaging: An Introduction

Corneal Imaging: An Introduction

Contributors: Miles F. Greenwald, BS, Brittni A. Scruggs, MD, PhD, Jesse M. Vislisel, MD, Mark A. Greiner, MD

The University of Iowa
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences


Introduction

Imaging techniques for assessing the structure and function of the cornea and anterior segment are crucial for diagnosing and treating a wide variety of ocular diseases. There is a huge variety of diagnostic testing available to ophthalmologists, and learning how to interpret these tests can seem daunting. For those beginning training in ophthalmology, the utilization of common diagnostic tests provides quicker and more accurate diagnosis and management of corneal diseases. The goal of this tutorial is to explain the basics of the most commonly used corneal imaging techniques at the University of Iowa, including an overview of how they work and how each modality is used in clinical practice.


Corneal Topography and Tomography

Basic Principles

Corneal topography is used to characterize the shape of the cornea, similar to how one would characterize a mountain using a topographic map. Originally, corneal topography was only used to describe the anterior surface of the cornea. Devices now are able to characterize both the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces, creating a three dimensional map. Advances in digital photography and computer processing have vastly increased the utility of corneal topography (1).

The first advancement in assessing the shape of the anterior corneal surface was made in the late 1800s with the development of the Placido disc (Figure 1A) (1-2). This technique characterizes the corneal surface by assessing the reflection of a set of concentric rings off the anterior corneal surface. As the image from the Placido disc is projected on the cornea, some of the light is reflected off the tear film-air interface like a mirror. The pattern of light reflection reveals the shape of the anterior surface of the cornea (1). Similarly, hand-held keratoscopes (Figure 1B-C) are practical instruments that display concentric rings at the slit lamp for quick assessment of topographical changes (e.g., astigmatism induced by sutures). The posterior corneal surface cannot be characterized using Placido disc technology or a hand-held keratoscope. Many topography machines rings (e.g., Atlas, NIDEK OPD-Scan) still utilize Placido discs but take the technique a step further, providing a computerized quantitative assessment of the corneal surface to provide more detailed information than one can appreciate by simply looking at the reflected.

A second technique for corneal topographic assessment is the scanning slit technique (e.g., Orbscan). This method uses rapidly scanning projected slit beams of light and a camera to capture the reflected beams to create a map of the anterior and posterior corneal surface. A third technique, known as Scheimpflug imaging, uses a rotating camera to photograph corneal cross-sections illuminated by slit beams at different angles (e.g., Pentacam). This method corrects for the non-planar shape of the cornea and, thus, allows greater accuracy and resolution in creating a 3-D map of the cornea (2-3).

Qualitative corneal topography tools
Figure 1. Qualitative corneal topography. A. Placido disc with concentric white circles. B-C. The Van Loenen cylindrical hand-held keratoscope when placed in front of a patient's eye at the slit lamp will reflect seven rings onto the corneal surface to quickly assess for qualitative topographical changes
Projection of Placido disc mires on
Figure 2. Projection of Placido disc mires on (A) a normal cornea with crisp mires and minimal astigmatism, (B) a cornea with surface dryness, (C) a cornea with regular against-the-rule astigmatism within a full-thickness corneal transplant, and (D) a cornea with irregular astigmatism within a full-thickness corneal transplant. Placido images can help guide selective suture removal; for example, the sutures in (C) could be removed at 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock, clinical course permitting, to reduce the post-operative astigmatism.

Placido disc interpretation

Placido disc images can be interpreted both qualitatively and quantitatively. The projected concentric rings are referred to as "mires." The shape of the corneal surface can be inferred by inspection of these mires. Similar to a topographic map of a mountain, areas where the mires appear closer together correspond to steeper corneal curvature. Areas where the mires are more widely spaced are flatter. The mires can also give information regarding the quality of the surface. Distinct, well-formed mires are referred to as "crisp" and suggest the underlying corneal surface to be regular and smooth.

As an ideal sphere, the cornea should have mires equally spaced over its entire surface (Figure 2A). Minor, insignificant variations are present in every cornea but may not be detectable on qualitative inspection of a Placido disc image. For example, distorted or wavy mires suggest surface irregularities, such as those caused by surface dryness (Figure 2B). Regular astigmatism results in mires that appear ovoid (Figure 2C). If irregular astigmatism is present, this may be seen as an irregularly distorted reflection of the mires (Figure 2D). Placido disc evaluation can also be used to guide suture removal following penetrating keratoplasty. Selectively removing sutures can reduce post-operative astigmatism (Figure 2C).

Zeiss Atlas and NIDEK OPD-Scan Interpretation

The Zeiss Atlas and NIDEK OPD-Scan are Placido disc-based topographers. As shown in Figure 3, the Zeiss Atlas report includes a Placido disc image and several maps that provide information regarding tangential curvature, axial curvature, and elevation. A tangential, or instantaneous, map is very similar to an axial map. It is a slightly more accurate way of characterizing the corneal curvature but appears more "noisy" and irregular. Axial maps are less sensitive at measuring the corneal curvature and, thus, are used mainly for screening purposes (4-5).

Similar to a Zeiss Atlas report, the NIDEK imaging report provides an axial curvature map and a Placido disc image. The NIDEK instrument also provides keratometry data, which are simulated measurements providing the dioptric refractive power in the two primary meridians. The patient's refractive error is approximated using both the autorefraction (REF) and wavefront (WF) measurements, and this refraction estimate is available in the auto-refraction window of the NIDEK report. Two additional maps are included from the NIDEK testing that are not available by other modalities: the Optical Path Difference (OPD) and the Internal OPD maps. The OPD specifically detects the total refractive error (in diopters) in the eye, including aberrations in the cornea, lens and other structures, whereas the Internal OPD map captures the refractive error contributed by internal structures of the eye by subtracting the corneal refractive power from the total OPD. Also measured in diopters, this measurement helps differentiate the effects of corneal and surface refractive error from internal aberrations (e.g., lenticular anomalies).

Zeiss Atlas Report
Figure 3. Zeiss Atlas Report. The tangential and axial curvature maps both show with-the-rule corneal astigmatism with more plus power in the vertical meridian. Specifically, the steepest meridian is at 083 degrees, and there are 2.88 diopters of astigmatism. The Placido disc image shows regular, concentric mires, indicating a healthy corneal surface.
NIDEK Report
Figure 4. NIDEK Report. Upper panes: The axial curvature map shows against-the-rule corneal astigmatism with more plus power in the horizontal meridian. The Placido disc image shows concentric mires with some irregularity in the inferonasal region of the cornea. The steepest meridian is at 002 degrees, and there are 4.68 diopters of astigmatism. Lower panes: Both the autorefraction (REF) and wavefront (WF) measurements estimate the patient having mild myopia (-0.75 to -1.25) with significant astigmatism correction (+3.25) in the horizontal meridian (009 to 010 degrees). The total refractive error is estimated using the optical path difference (OPD) to be -0.75 diopters with +3.25 of astigmatism at axis 010.

Pentacam Interpretation

The Oculus Pentacam utilizes Scheimpflug technology to create topographic reports. The reports contain a great deal of information, and samples of the overview report and the 4 maps report are provided below (Figure 5A-B). Specifically, the overview report provides the Scheimpflug image, which is a cross-sectional image showing the cornea, anterior chamber, iris, and lens. A 3-D representation of the patient's corneal shape is also provided. The density of the cornea is evaluated using densitometry, which is an objective measurement of light scatter in the cornea. Any densitometry value less than ~30 is considered normal; thus, a condition resulting in decreased corneal clarity (e.g., corneal edema) will increase the densitometry value. There is also a convenient summary of the keratometry, pachymetry, and other numeric measurements in this report. A pachymetry color map indicates corneal thickness.

The Pentacam 4 maps report also provides a summary of keratometry, pachymetry with map, and other numeric measurements. Similar to the NIDEK report, the Pentacam report includes an axial map that depicts the curvature of the anterior corneal surface in dioptric values for each point.

Anterior float and posterior float images, which are elevation maps, are generated on the Pentacam report. Instead of displaying the refractive power of the cornea, elevation maps display the shape of the cornea by comparing it to a computer-generated best-fit sphere (i.e., a perfect sphere that best approximates the corneal shape on average). Posterior float, similar to the anterior float, shows the shape of the posterior cornea compared to a best-fit sphere.

Pentacam Overview Report
Figure 5A. Pentacam Overview Report. Upper panes: the Scheimpflug image is a cross-sectional image showing the cornea, anterior chamber, iris, and lens. Densitometry measurement estimates corneal clarity; any value greater than 30 may indicate decreased corneal clarity. Lower panes: A 3-D representation of the patient's corneal shape is provided; the anterior corneal surface is shown in red, posterior corneal surface in green, and iris in blue. A pachymetry map is a color map that indicates corneal thickness; cooler colors are thicker and warmer colors are thinner (numeric scale on right).
Pentacam 4 Map Report
Figure 5B. Pentacam 4 Map Report. The axial curvature map, also known as a sagittal map, depicts the curvature of the anterior corneal surface in dioptric values for each point. The color scale represents the power in diopters at each particular point. Warmer colors represent steeper corneal curvature while cooler colors represent flatter areas. For the elevation maps (anterior and posterior float), warmer colors denote where the cornea is elevated above the best fit sphere and cooler colors denote where the cornea is depressed below the best fit sphere. A pachymetry map is a color map that indicates corneal thickness; cooler colors are thicker and warmer colors are thinner.

Clinical Uses of Corneal Topography

  • Screening for corneal ectasia

    Keratoconus, the most common corneal ectasia, is a progressive corneal condition characterized by central thinning and steepening of the cornea. Early keratoconus often looks normal on slit lamp examination, and manual keratometry, which assesses the central 3 mm, may give an insufficient assessment. Because of this, topography has become the gold standard for screening patients for keratoconus and other corneal ectasias (Figures 6-8).

  • Corneal ectasia monitoring and treatment

    Once an ectasia (e.g., keratoconus, Pellucid marginal corneal degeneration) is diagnosed, topography may be useful for monitoring disease progression. With regular surveillance topography, it can be determined when patients are at risk for progression and complications, and this precise monitoring allows early intervention with treatments such as collagen cross-linking or keratoplasty. Topographic warning signs include high central corneal power, a large difference between the two corneas of a patient, and a large disparity between the refractive power at the apex and the periphery (Figures 6-8) (5).

  • Refractive surgery screening and monitoring

    Laser refractive surgeries such as photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) use excimer laser to ablate tissue and reshape the cornea to correct an individual's refractive error. Not every patient, however, can safely undergo these procedures. Screening must be performed to determine corneal shape and patterns of astigmatism on topography before refractive surgery can safely be performed. Topography can also be used post-operatively to evaluate etiology for unsatisfactory visual outcome such as decentered or incomplete ablations.

  • Pre-operative intraocular lens selection

    During cataract surgery, an intraocular lens is placed in the eye to achieve the desired refractive outcome. Standard intraocular lenses only contain spherical correction. If a patient has regular corneal astigmatism, however, an astigmatism-correcting toric lens may be used. Corneal topography is a useful pre-operative test to assess the magnitude and regularity of corneal cylinder when selecting an intraocular lens implant prior to cataract surgery.

  • Post-keratoplasty astigmatism evaluation and management

    After keratoplasty, corneal astigmatism can be evaluated with topography. This technology guides selective suture removal and other interventions to reduce levels of astigmatism.

  • Ocular surface disorder evaluation

    Ocular surface disorders, such as pterygia, corneal scars, and Salzmann nodules, can induce irregular corneal astigmatism. Corneal topography can be used to evaluate the refractive effects of these problems and to aid in disease monitoring and surgical planning.

Pellucid marginal corneal degeneration
Figure 6. Pellucid marginal corneal degeneration (A) and keratonconus (B). Anterior axial maps generated with Oculus Pentacam technology shows the high against the rule astigmatism in a "crab claw" pattern of pellucid marginal corneal degeneration and the inferior steepening pattern of keratonconus.
Progression of keratoconus
Figure 7. Progression of keratoconus. Frequently the topography will show progression of keratoconus from symmetric astigmatism to asymmetric astigmatism, followed by asymmetric astigmatism pattern with a skewed radial axis. With progressive keratoconus, inferior steepening can ultimately develop.
Pellucid marginal corneal degeneration
Figure 8. Keratoconus on Pentacam. The anterior axial map shows significant inferior paracentral steepening, while the pachymetry map shows thinning in the area of steepening. The anterior and posterior floats reveal a paracentral bulge, which suggests focal elevation compared to an ideal, spherical surface.

Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT)

Basic Principles

Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) produces high-resolution imaging of the cornea, iris, and anterior chamber (e.g., Visante). It is analogous to ultrasound, but it utilizes light waves instead of sound to produce extremely high-resolution images of very small ocular structures (Figures 9 and 10). AS-OCT uses two scanning beams of light that are reflected off an ocular structure and then detected and compared to a reference beam to create a cross-sectional image (6).

Interpretation Guide

Visante AS-OCT showing normal anterior chamber anatomy
Figure 9. Visante AS-OCT showing normal anterior chamber anatomy, including the cornea, iris, iridocorneal angle, anterior chamber depth and pupil diameter.
Visante report showing a poorly-adherent Descemets Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) graft
Figure 10. Visante report showing a poorly-adherent Descemets Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) graft. The graft successfully adhered after another air bubble was placed within the anterior chamber. Each OCT image is a two-dimensional slice through the anterior chamber. The four orientation arrows, which are located above every OCT image, indicate the left side (arrow tail) and the right side (arrowhead) of the image. The angle of orientation is also displayed.

Clinical Uses

  • Anterior chamber angle assessment

    AS-OCT allows both qualitative and quantitative assessment of the iridocorneal angle. It is can be used as an adjunct to gonioscopy for glaucoma diagnosis and management.

  • Surgical planning for LASIK enhancements

    AS-OCT can be used to measure the residual stromal bed beneath a LASIK flap when determining whether or not there is sufficient stroma remaining to perform a flap lift and enhancement (Figure 11).

  • Surgical planning for phakic intraocular lens implants

    Phakic intraocular lens implants (e.g., Verisyse™) can be placed in series with the natural crystalline lens for correction of high myopia. The AS-OCT allows detailed measurements of the anterior chamber dimensions to assess whether or not sufficient anterior chamber space is available for one of these lens implants (Figure 12) (7).

  • Assessment of graft position after keratoplasty

    AS-OCT is a useful adjunct to slit lamp examination for the assessment of endothelial graft adherence during the immediate postoperative period

  • Keratoprosthesis post-surgical management

    AS-OCT can provide additional information regarding structural integrity of prosthetic corneas, such as the Type I Boston keratoprosthesis (Figure 14).

Measurement of the residual stromal bed beneath a LASIK flap on AS-OCT
Figure 11. Measurement of the residual stromal bed beneath a LASIK flap on AS-OCT. The central corneal thickness is estimated to be 525µm, and the residual stromal bed is measured to be 321µm centrally and 377-399µm toward the peripheral cornea. At the University of Iowa, a patient is deemed not a candidate for LASIK or enhancement if the final calculated residual stromal bed is less than 300µm.
Phakic intraocular lens (IOL) surgical planning on AS-OCT
Figure 12. Phakic intraocular lens (IOL) surgical planning on AS-OCT. The Visante device is able to superimpose a digital phakic IOL into the anterior chamber to ensure there is adequate space for safe implantation of the device.
Type I Boston keratoprosthesis device as examined using AS-OCT
Figure 13a. Type I Boston keratoprosthesis device as examined using AS-OCT
Type I Boston keratoprosthesis device as examined using slit-lamp
Figure 13b. Type I Boston keratoprosthesis device as examined using slit-lamp.

Confocal Microscopy

Basic principles

Confocal microscopy is an imaging technique that allows in vivo examination of corneal structures at high magnification and resolution. Building off of imaging principles developed for neuronal imaging, confocal microscopy was first used to study the cornea in the 1990s (9-10). The device (e.g., NIDEK Confoscan, Heidelberg HRTII) allows characterization of each of the five corneal layers by simultaneously illuminating and imaging a single point of tissue (Figure 14) (11). The point light source and the camera are in the same plane, hence the name "confocal." Modern confocal microscopes scan small regions of tissue, illuminating and imaging thousands of points of tissue to create the final confocal image (10). By scanning different thickness levels of certain tissues in the anterior segment, significant information about structure and function at the cellular level can be gained.

Confocal microscopy imaging of the various corneal layers using laser-scanning in vivo confocal technology
Figure 14. Confocal microscopy imaging of the various corneal layers using laser-scanning in vivo confocal technology. 1-3. Superficial epithelium, epithelial wing cell layer, and basal epithelium; 4. Subbasal nerve plexus; 5. Bowman's layer; 6-8. anterior stroma with nerve (arrow), mid stroma with nerve trunk (arrow), and posterior stroma; 9. Endothelium; and 10. Inferior limbal palisade ridges (black arrows) with focal stromal projections (white arrows). Image courtesy of Dr. Neil Lagali (Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden) (11).
 Confocal microscopy showing normal corneal endothelium
Figure 15. Confocal microscopy showing normal corneal endothelium. Note the small, hexagonal cells with minimal variation in cell size or shape.

Interpretation Guide

When used to assess endothelial cell health, both qualitative inspection of the endothelium and quantitative assessment of the endothelial cell density must be performed. Normal endothelial cells should appear small, hexagonal, and uniform. Pleomorphism is the presence of high variation in cell shape, while polymegathism is variation in cell size. Endothelial cell density can be obtained automatically or by manual counting and is expressed as cells/mm2 (Figure 15).

Clinical Uses

  • Corneal endothelial assessment

    Examination of the corneal endothelium at a cellular level allows qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the cells. Endothelial cell size, shape, and density can all be characterized, which provides important information for diagnosing and managing posterior corneal dystrophies, such as Fuchs dystrophy (Figure 16), iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome, and posterior polymorphous dystrophy. The confocal microscope can help with diagnostic decisions, such as whether post-keratoplasty edema is due to corneal graft rejection (evidenced by inflammatory cells visualized) or endothelial decompensation (evidenced by low endothelial cell density) (Figure 17) (7, 10).

  • Identification of infectious keratitis

    Infectious keratitis is a vision-threatening condition in which prompt diagnosis is imperative to preserve vision and the eye. Confocal microscopy is a useful adjunct to help rapidly identify the causative agent in vivo, such as fungi or Acanthamoeba, so appropriate treatment can be initiated. Acanthamoeba appear in their cystic form as highly-reflective ovoid structures (Figures 18 and 19). Fungi may appear as brightly reflective filaments and may have evidence of septations (Figure 20) (9).

  • Corneal nerve morphology evaluation

    Confocal microscopy can help quantify pathology of the subbasal nerve plexus in patients with neurotrophic keratopathy and diabetic neuropathy involving the cornea.

  • Corneal depth measurement

    Similar to OCT, confocal microscopy can measure the depth of structures, such as deposits, scars, or LASIK flaps within the cornea to aid with surgical planning.

Fuchs endothelial dystrophy showing characteristic guttae
Figure 16. Fuchs endothelial dystrophy showing characteristic guttae (dark areas) and reduced endothelial cell density on confocal microscopy.
Endothelial decompensation within a penetrating keratoplasty graft
Figure 17. Endothelial decompensation within a penetrating keratoplasty graft. There are no identifiable endothelial cells on confocal microscopy.
 Acanthamoeba keratitis as seen on confocal microscopy
Figure 18. Acanthamoeba keratitis as seen on confocal microscopy. The cysts appear as high-contrast round objects while the trophozoites appear as irregular forms.
Confocal microscopy detection of Acanthamoeba and fungal keratitis in a contact lens user
Figure 19. Confocal microscopy detection of Acanthamoeba and fungal keratitis in a contact lens user. A. Endothelial polymegathism, which is a sign of corneal stress, is likely a result of the patient's long-term contact lens use. No cysts or trophozoites are present in the endothelial layer. B. White blood cell recruitment (red circle) is evident in the anterior stroma directly adjacent to both Acanthamoeba cysts (white arrow) and fungal elements (red box). The Acanthamoeba trophozoites feed on hyphae if both infections are not promptly treated. C. Acanthamoeba double-walled cysts (white arrow) and trophozoites (black arrows) are present throughout the anterior stroma. The Z-scan profile depicts the backscatter (i.e., brightness of the individual confocal scans), which allows quick assessment of corneal location (red box) and cell density in the specific region.
FFungal keratitis seen on confocal microscopy.
Figure 20. Fungal keratitis seen on confocal microscopy. Branching hyphae help confirm the diagnosis of Fusarium keratitis.

Summary

Ophthalmology is a rapidly advancing field with new technology for diagnosis and treatment being developed and implemented each year. As more advanced techniques (e.g., LASIK, endothelial keratoplasty) develop, the utility of advanced corneal imaging technique continues to grow. This tutorial has aimed to provide an overview of corneal imaging topics and to give trainees a foundation to build upon as they master the use of these fundamental tools of modern clinical ophthalmology.


References

  1. Brody J, Waller S, Wagoner M. Corneal Topography: History, Technique, and Clinical Uses. International Ophthalmology Clinics. 1994;34(3):197-207. [PMID: 7960515]
  2. Prakash G. Corneal topography. 2015. [Cited 2016 May 27]; Available from http://eyewiki.org/Corneal_topography
  3. Hashemi H, Mehravaran S. Day to Day Clinically Relevant Corneal Elevation, Thickness, and Curvature Parameters Using the Orbscan II Scanning Slit Topographer and the Pentacam Scheimpflug Imaging Device. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2010;17(1):44-55. [PMID: 20543936]
  4. Friedman N. Pearls for Interpreting Corneal Topography Maps. 2013. [Cited 2016 May 27]; Available from http://www.ophthalmologyweb.com/Featured-Articles/142292-Pearls-for-Interpreting-Corneal-Topography-Maps/
  5. Lopes, B, Ramos, I, Dawson, D, et. al. Detection of Ectatic Corneal Diseases Based on Pentacam. Z. Med. Phys. 2016; 26(2): 136–142. [PMID: 26777318]
  6. Radhakrishnana S. Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography. 2014. [Cited 2016 May 27]; Available from http://eyewiki.aao.org/Anterior_Segment_Optical_Coherence_Tomography
  7. Kent C. Making the Most of Anterior Segment OCT. 2011. [Cited 2016 May 27]; Available from http://www.reviewofophthalmology.com/content/i/1471/c/27717/
  8. http://webeye.ophth.uiowa.edu/eyeforum/cases-i/case211/L/5a-kpro.jpg
  9. Tavakoli M, Hossain P, Malik RA. Clinical applications of corneal confocal microscopy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008;2(2):435-45. [PMID: 19668734]
  10. Erie JC, Mclaren JW, Patel SV. Confocal microscopy in ophthalmology. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(5):639-46. [PMID 19674730]
  11. Lagali N, Bourghardt Peebo B, Germundsson J, et. al. (2013). Laser-Scanning in vivo Confocal Microscopy of the Cornea: Imaging and Analysis Methods for Preclinical and Clinical Applications, Confocal Laser Microscopy. Principles and Applications in Medicine, Biology, and the Food Sciences, Neil Lagali (Ed.), InTech, Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/confocal-laser-microscopy-principles-and-applications-in-medicine-biology-and-the-food-sciences/laser-scanning-in-vivo-confocal-microscopy-of-the-cornea-imaging-and-analysis-methods-for-preclinica

Suggested citation

Greenwald MF, Scruggs BA, Vislisel JM, Greiner MA. Corneal Imaging: An Introduction. EyeRounds.org. Posted October 19, 2016; Available from: https://eyerounds.org/tutorials/corneal-imaging/index.htm